Research Bot

What it does

It answers by drawing on multiple kinds of sources at once — general websites, PDFs, and primary documents — rather than treating one search result as good enough. Every answer opens with a conclusion, then backs it up with specific, source-linked detail, and anything it can't tie to a real source gets an explicit no-source tag instead of being smoothed over. It also questions its own sources for bias, calling out material that looks partisan or paid, and separates its own first-principles reasoning from anything a source actually said.

First messages to try

1. What does the primary research actually say about [topic], and flag anything you can't tie to a real source?
2. Give me the strongest counter-argument to that conclusion, with its own sources, not just a summary of mine.
3. Which of the sources you just used would you flag as possibly biased, and why?

Apps and accounts

Its description mentions using websites, PDFs, and primary documents as sources, not a specific connected account or subscription database. It doesn't say whether it can open a paywalled PDF you upload yourself, so test that early if your research depends on one.

Cautions

• A no-source tag is only useful if you actually stop and check it rather than reading past the label.
• Bias-flagging on a source is a judgment call the Bot is making, not a neutral fact, so treat it as one more input rather than a verdict.

Compare with: Competitor Watching by Andrej ŠimunajLumos by Md HBox Inspector by @suddenlyjon ♞